The traditional manual assaying process for food grains in Govt. Procurement Agency was subjective, leading to inconsistencies and variations in grain assessment. This subjectivity resulted in unreliable quality control measures and posed challenges in ensuring consistent grain quality across different procurement locations.
The manual assaying process lacked efficiency, resulting in delays and bottlenecks within the procurement value chain. Manual inspections and assessments were time-consuming, causing operational inefficiencies and impacting Govt. Procurement Agency’s ability to meet procurement targets promptly.
The traditional process suffered from inaccuracies in assessing parameters such as moisture content, broken grains, immature grains, shriveled grains, and foreign matter detection. This lack of accuracy compromised the reliability of grain quality assessments, leading to potential quality control issues and impacting the overall value of procured food grains.
The manual process lacked traceability, making it difficult to track and monitor the quality and movement of grains throughout the procurement chain. The absence of a transparent and traceable system increased the risk of fraud, tampering, and inconsistent accountability at different stages of the procurement value chain.
The reliance on manual record-keeping and paperwork hindered decision-making, data analysis, and efficient information flow. The extensive paperwork and manual data entry processes not only consumed valuable time and resources but also increased the risk of errors and data loss.
The lack of real-time visibility and comprehensive data accessibility hindered effective monitoring and analysis of the procurement process. Stakeholders faced challenges in obtaining timely insights and accessing accurate and up-to-date information about inspections, assessments, and procurement details.
The inefficiencies in the manual processes and paperwork resulted in administrative burdens and slower decision-making. The need for physical paperwork and manual data integration created bottlenecks, impeding the smooth flow of information and hindering efficient coordination among different stakeholders involved in the procurement value chain.
The subjective and inefficient assessment process posed potential quality control issues, impacting the overall quality of procured food grains. Inaccurate assessments and lack of consistency increased the risk of procuring substandard grains, affecting the reputation of Govt. Procurement Agency and its ability to meet quality standards.
Without real-time insights and comprehensive analytics, The Procurement Agency faced challenges in identifying and addressing issues promptly, leading to reactive rather than proactive quality control measures. The absence of timely insights limited Govt. Procurement Agency’s ability to take corrective actions in a timely manner and optimize the procurement process based on real-time market dynamics.
The absence of a centralized system and traceable records affected accountability and transparency throughout the procurement value chain. Stakeholders faced difficulties in verifying the accuracy and authenticity of assessments and transactions, hindering trust-building efforts and increasing the risk of non-compliance or unethical practices.
Bringing trust, speed & transparency in the agriculture value chain using AI-based food assessment technologies
REACH US
Browse
Software Tech, Park Of India, Sector 75, Mohali
118-120, Suncity Success Tower, Sector 65, Gurugram
1105, The Landmark, Sector 7, Hiranandani Service Road, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai – 410210
UAE
Switzerland
